Mike the Pike wrote:Random thoughts...
Then again, is it any worse than Francisco Goya's "Horrors of War" series? Damien Hirst's sheep etc etc?
I think that the combination of sex and violence is what puts most people off, but again,the same sort of thing (actually even more graphic) can be seen in any number of 'good' war movies.
Is it the medium or the content which offends? Why is sexual violence depicted in movies acceptable (as art and message) but not in Miniature?
Yet, it's obviously not a table top piece, it's meant as an artistic diorama. Mind you none of his other stuff even comes close to being so thought provoking.
P.P.S. Is the artist even a male? Would it change perspectives if it were created by a woman?
The Pike already said most everything that was passing through my mind. (Except for the "is the artist even male" bit. Food for thought there. A couple other comments-
This is not an artwork depicting gratuitous sexual violence for the sake of getting a pervy hard on. (I'd put that Wet Nurse piece in that category.) It's telling a war story. No different than any hundred movies. Seeing that scene depicted in "toys" with such technical mastery is the shocking part.
The part that actually frightened me, how the stern, grim 40K expressions of the models faces translated the cold brutality of rape so perfectly. I've never had a diorama make me think like this one.
Should do us all good to be reminded that in the real world there are no Space Marines or Tyranids. There is no glory in real war, just senseless waste and pain and death. There are no monsters but those that we become ourselves.
...and now his Head was full of nothing but Inchantments, Quarrels, Battles, Challenges, Wounds, Complaints, Amours, and abundance of Stuff and Impossibilities.....
Cervantes, Don Quixote