Question regarding future NH events and armylists
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:17 am
So.... I posted earlier in the 40k section about "what codex would you like to see?" and M_i_J made a point about having an 'official' rule set for the Imperial Armour - Eldar Corsairs armylist. One of the things that I have been considering for NagoyaHammer is the idea of making the army choices a bit less restrictive next year. This year there was a limit* of only using official codexes for the tournament and everything went smoothly. We had a fair mix of armies and saw Dark Angels, Tyranids, Tau and Blood Angels at the top of the heap at the end of the day. (Necrons totally won it though
).
But how would folks feel about opening it up a bit more. The goal of the event is to have fun rather than play to win regardless of other factors. I'm not saying that winning isn't good, just that my aim in running the event is for everyone to go home feeling that they had a good time even if they got crushed like a bunch of orks. (Sorry Badruck and Konrad).
There are quite a few variant armylists kicking about for 40K, some of them pretty good too.
There are the Imperial Armour lists such as Eldar Corsairs, Tyrant's Legion, Elysian Drop Troops, Vraks Renegades and so on.
There are several fan made armylists on the internet from sites like the Codex Project where they are working on some loyalist and traitor marine rules and Tempus Fugitives which has some (very nicely presented) books under development such as Ad-Mech, Tau Auxiliaries and Harlequins.
Now I know what some people's first reaction will be about the fan-made stuff, but let me ask you this. So long as it has been playtested, looks balanced and sounds fun, what exactly is the harm? Codex Grey Knights, Space Wolves and all of the other 'broken' official books are allowed without question. If the fan-based books are approved before use, announced to everyone and readily available for people to check up on before the event, is it really that bad?
Likewise IA books are made by GW group employees, surely they should be of an acceptable standard.
I'd like to get people's ideas on this, so take some time to think over the pros and cons and let me know.
Would it be more 'fun' to see more variety in the armies and for people to be able to bring along something special?
*And yes, I know I am the one who set these limits.
But how would folks feel about opening it up a bit more. The goal of the event is to have fun rather than play to win regardless of other factors. I'm not saying that winning isn't good, just that my aim in running the event is for everyone to go home feeling that they had a good time even if they got crushed like a bunch of orks. (Sorry Badruck and Konrad).
There are quite a few variant armylists kicking about for 40K, some of them pretty good too.
There are the Imperial Armour lists such as Eldar Corsairs, Tyrant's Legion, Elysian Drop Troops, Vraks Renegades and so on.
There are several fan made armylists on the internet from sites like the Codex Project where they are working on some loyalist and traitor marine rules and Tempus Fugitives which has some (very nicely presented) books under development such as Ad-Mech, Tau Auxiliaries and Harlequins.
Now I know what some people's first reaction will be about the fan-made stuff, but let me ask you this. So long as it has been playtested, looks balanced and sounds fun, what exactly is the harm? Codex Grey Knights, Space Wolves and all of the other 'broken' official books are allowed without question. If the fan-based books are approved before use, announced to everyone and readily available for people to check up on before the event, is it really that bad?
Likewise IA books are made by GW group employees, surely they should be of an acceptable standard.
I'd like to get people's ideas on this, so take some time to think over the pros and cons and let me know.
Would it be more 'fun' to see more variety in the armies and for people to be able to bring along something special?
*And yes, I know I am the one who set these limits.