You're just jealous because we dont have twigs in our hair.kojibear wrote:Both Tenorikuma and I have painted Wood Elves with pretty horses. If she is coming we can bring them alongAuxryn wrote:I've mentioned that eldar are elves, or that she could play Warhammer Fantasy as actual elves, but she has yet to bite.
Perhaps if someone is showing off a beautifully painted army on a day when she happens to tag along, but that essentially means 'perhaps if the stars align just right.'Not that we are in any way girly mind you. That's the High Elves
![]()
Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
Painted Minis in 2014: 510, in 2015: 300, in 2016 :369, in 2019: 417, in 2020: 450
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
How did ye know???????Primarch wrote:
You're just jealous because we dont have twigs in our hair.
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
@pdfitzg That's America for you. Perfectly okay to show people shooting each other, but a nipple slip? Good heavens! Think of the children!pdfitzg wrote:Totally agree. I get the bit that their victims are supposed to be seeing what they think is beautiful, but I just don't dig the ugly daemonettes. They should be evil and sexy. Also think GW paints them weird to not offend anyone online with nudity. I'll never forget the story about a guy complaining that he didn't like the nude models because his kid plays Chaos. LOL, guess boobs are more offensive than human flesh hanging from armor....
I digress. The rest of the Slannesh stuff looked pretty cool to me. I'll never own Chaos, but look forward to playing against the new models.
me_in_japan wrote:The problem with the new Slaanesh stuff is the same problem the entire current Slaaneshi range has - none of the daemonettes are sexy/pretty. They're not even nasty evil daemons (like, say, the bloodletters are) - they're just ugly. Slaanesh works because the daemonettes are (historically, at least) delicate, pretty, beautiful temptresses. The steeds and beasts are all weirdy demonic looking wotsits, but the daemonettes should look pretty but do horrible things. If they look ugly they completely miss the dual nature of Slaanesh and just become boring old evil monsters. We already have those in the shape of bloodletters, so what's the point of Slaanesh?
And I think Raging Heros might have your sexy daemonettes sorted out. They've got some not-Wytches too. And a Commisar that could make the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue.
http://www.ragingheroes.com/collections ... ing-mantis
...and now his Head was full of nothing but Inchantments, Quarrels, Battles, Challenges, Wounds, Complaints, Amours, and abundance of Stuff and Impossibilities.....
Cervantes, Don Quixote
Cervantes, Don Quixote
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
@Konrad. LOL on the America comment. I admit it's true.
Also agree about the link you posted. Much better demonettes.
Paul
Armies: IG, BA, SOB
Armies: IG, BA, SOB
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
Seconded!pdfitzg wrote: Also agree about the link you posted. Much better demonettes.
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
Edit* They do have a very interesting Wood Elf Goddess
Ariel. (Not the little mermaid of course)
http://www.ragingheroes.com/collections ... ry-version
http://www.ragingheroes.com/collections ... ry-version
- Admiral-Badruck
- Destroyer of Worlds
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:22 pm
- Location: Mekk Town AKA OGAKI
Re: Spevna Stance Vs. Slaanesh
Very cool indeed. 
"i agree with badruck" -...
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ