me_in_japan wrote:The obvious way to avoid that problem would be to just not do it. I have a sneaking suspicion GW don't care for power gaming, and just dont factor it in to their play testing.
Yes, and probably yes.
me_in_japan wrote:The obvious way to avoid that problem would be to just not do it. I have a sneaking suspicion GW don't care for power gaming, and just dont factor it in to their play testing.
I don't want to imagine thatDanguinius wrote:Ohhh, and Chaos Marines and Daemons are battle brothers, so a Fateweaver lead force is completely viable. Can you imagine all of your Terminators and Obliterators re-rolling their 2+ armor saves?! And with the supposed nerf to power weapons (AP3), they will be virtually unkillable. It looks like more wonderful "play-testing" by GW ("Hey, let`s let people include allies in their armies. We can sell a lot more units that way. What could go wrong?")![]()
Danguinius
@Badruck - I haven't seen this show yet, is it any good?Admiral-Badruck wrote:Para Los que solo entienden latin vulgar
El cielo se está cayendo! El cielo se está cayendo! "
Or for our Anglo readers.
The sky is falling. The sky is falling.
Fur doz dat just bark orkky bark.
Unkiwizza unkiwizza.
I really don't see what the hubbub is about. I am sure the game will be fun and that is all that matters.
And why would you? As I said, nobody plays like that around here anyway.Tenorikuma wrote:I'm thinking about taking a cheap Space Marine or Imperial Guard HQ/Troop combo so I can field a Valkyrie or Storm Talon with my Wolves. I couldn't really care less about power gaming.