Luk mike da pyk can bark orcy bark..Mike the Pike wrote:^Sez hee hoo mist att leest harfa duzzin kapitalz ann apostrofy orr too az welll az yuzin weigh 2 menny sentins fraggments.![]()
![]()
Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
- Admiral-Badruck
- Destroyer of Worlds
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:22 pm
- Location: Mekk Town AKA OGAKI
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
"i agree with badruck" -...
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
Its called a Testudo, as the page clearly tells you.Admiral-Badruck wrote:http://store.warlordgames.co.uk/testudo-6311-p.asp
It's a 6 part model (I believe Ash has one?) So you would have real difficulty with removing casualties.
Roman Armour looked like this:

Bands of iron over a woolen tunic with nothing to protect the lower half of the body or arms.
WFB Heavy armour is more along these lines:

Solid pieces of steel with extra pieces over the joints to protect them, usually with chain mail underneath to cover the areas the plate doesn't. As you can see, it is also a lot sexier.
Painted Minis in 2014: 510, in 2015: 300, in 2016 :369, in 2019: 417, in 2020: 450
- Admiral-Badruck
- Destroyer of Worlds
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:22 pm
- Location: Mekk Town AKA OGAKI
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
fair enough but the big bad shield should count for something...
"i agree with badruck" -...
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
- Colonel Voss
- Moderator
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:16 pm
- Location: Yokkaichi, Mie
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
Tetsudos was used when approaching a fortified wall. In the open field it would be a poor formation as it is very slow moving and once the first guy dies the formation would collapse in on itself.
In fantasy, sword plus shield confer a 6+ ward save in addition to the normal armor save.
In fantasy, sword plus shield confer a 6+ ward save in addition to the normal armor save.
It's easy to die in the swamp. What's hard is to staying dead.
-Alten Ashley
Iron within, Iron without
-Alten Ashley
Iron within, Iron without
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
Are you sure that "Testudo" is the proper term for the scaled armor used by legionnaires during the 2nd century? I believe, like Voss, it just refers the turtle-like formation used by Romans during some operations.
I got "squamae" or squama" on wikipedia. Oh, yes, this was the term I read so many times as a kid. (lorica squamata)
And, yes, Voss, the plate armors is sexy, but does she also try on the scaled armor?
I got "squamae" or squama" on wikipedia. Oh, yes, this was the term I read so many times as a kid. (lorica squamata)
And, yes, Voss, the plate armors is sexy, but does she also try on the scaled armor?
Models Painted, 2020
70 28mm miniatureS
70 28mm miniatureS
- Admiral-Badruck
- Destroyer of Worlds
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:22 pm
- Location: Mekk Town AKA OGAKI
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
This is why I do not play historical...Colonel Voss wrote: Its called a Testudo, as the page clearly tells you. .
It's a 6 part model (I believe Ash has one?) So you would have real difficulty with removing casualties.
Roman Armour looked like this:
Bands of iron over a woolen tunic with nothing to protect the lower half of the body or arms.
Tetsudos was used when approaching a fortified wall. In the open field it would be a poor formation as it is very slow moving and once the first guy dies the formation would collapse in on itself.
Are you sure that "Testudo" is the proper term for the scaled armor used by legionnaires during the 2nd century? I believe, like Voss, it just refers the turtle-like formation used by Romans during some operations.
I got "squamae" or squama" on wikipedia. Oh, yes, this was the term I read so many times as a kid. (lorica squamata)
And, yes, Voss, the plate armors is sexy, but does she also try on the scaled armor?
"i agree with badruck" -...
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
MIJ
Consider me a member of the "we love badruck" fan-club.
MIJ
- Mike the Pike
- Prince of Purple
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:42 pm
- Location: Toyokawa
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
prim was talking about the formation too (if you follow his link) which Badruck wanted to use for Skaven (WTF!!!!). The picture of armour was to illustrate a point about, well, Roman armour.
The picture of the beautiful woman wearing plate armour was just to make us all feel bad 
Morituri nolumus mori!
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
Er....job wrote:Are you sure that "Testudo" is the proper term for the scaled armor used by legionnaires during the 2nd century? I believe, like Voss, it just refers the turtle-like formation used by Romans during some operations.![]()
The formation that Badruck posted a link to, that says Testudo in the link, has Testudo written all over the page and is a model of the classic Roman 'tortoise' assault style is called a Testudo. The armour pictured is lōrīca segmentāta, similar to banded mail. Lorica squamata is more like scale mail.
Thanks.Mike the Pike wrote:prim was talking about the formation too (if you follow his link) which Badruck wanted to use for Skaven (WTF!!!!). The picture of armour was to illustrate a point about, well, Roman armour.![]()
![]()
The picture of the beautiful woman wearing plate armour was just to make us all feel bad
You dont actually need to know any of this stuff to play historical games. Its not like you read any of the Warhammer novels before you play 40K or WFB right? Has it ever come up in a game exactly how many implants a Space Marine has, or which ones the Space Wolves dont have? Did it ever become relevant that you didnt know the name of one of the Elector Count's Runefangs? Historical stuff is the same. So long as stuff looks roughly about right, you're ok.Admiral-Badruck wrote:This is why I do not play historical...
You do know that GW does Historical games based on an earlier version of WFB (4th or 5th I think) dont you? Given that you dont really play any non-GW games, they may be a good introduction.
In a Testudo formation, the men could move forward without being shot at, though they couldnt move that fast as they had to remain in formation. Perhaps a 2+ armour save against shooting would be accurate, but no marching or charging. As Voss says, they couldnt fight in that formation, as they had no room to swing their swords. In combat they'd be back to their 5+ save with their 6+ parry.Admiral-Badruck wrote:fair enough but the big bad shield should count for something...
Painted Minis in 2014: 510, in 2015: 300, in 2016 :369, in 2019: 417, in 2020: 450
- Colonel Voss
- Moderator
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:16 pm
- Location: Yokkaichi, Mie
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
Tetsudo was used after the Marius reform. Before hand, there were different types of shields used by different level of soldier, velites, hastati, principes, triarii being the order of battle.
Basically I would put it like this for the empire,
Velites: archer skirmishers (though technically javelins)
Hastati and principes; swordsmen
Triarii; spearmen
after Marius, I would go with
Legionarie (based on the principes); swordsmen
Auxilia; spearmen
About the stormvermin, remember that they use halberds, something the legions never had. That long stick was a javelin designed for one throw (if you tried to pick it up and use again, it would break). Also, the legions were if anything, super reliable whereas the skaven are anything but.
Basically I would put it like this for the empire,
Velites: archer skirmishers (though technically javelins)
Hastati and principes; swordsmen
Triarii; spearmen
after Marius, I would go with
Legionarie (based on the principes); swordsmen
Auxilia; spearmen
About the stormvermin, remember that they use halberds, something the legions never had. That long stick was a javelin designed for one throw (if you tried to pick it up and use again, it would break). Also, the legions were if anything, super reliable whereas the skaven are anything but.
It's easy to die in the swamp. What's hard is to staying dead.
-Alten Ashley
Iron within, Iron without
-Alten Ashley
Iron within, Iron without
-
AndrewGPaul
- Champion
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:49 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
- Contact:
Re: Counts as armies Good? Bad? or just Ugly?
You want to use Roman Legion models in a Warhammer army?
Dwarfs.
The "popular" depiction of an Imperial Roman army is solid, dependable and built like a brick ... outhouse. You use Legionaries as Warriors, auxiliary archers as crossbowmen, Praetorian Guard (or something obviously "elite"-looking) as Ironbreakers and then you've got stone throwers and bolt throwers. Use what you like for the various "fantasy" elements such as Runesmiths, Anvils of Doom and the like. You can even have Slayers, if you add in a unit of allied Celts/Germans.
The current Skaven armour has a bit of an Oriental look to it, if you squint a bit, although the actual performance of the army is obviously different.
Dwarfs.
The "popular" depiction of an Imperial Roman army is solid, dependable and built like a brick ... outhouse. You use Legionaries as Warriors, auxiliary archers as crossbowmen, Praetorian Guard (or something obviously "elite"-looking) as Ironbreakers and then you've got stone throwers and bolt throwers. Use what you like for the various "fantasy" elements such as Runesmiths, Anvils of Doom and the like. You can even have Slayers, if you add in a unit of allied Celts/Germans.
The current Skaven armour has a bit of an Oriental look to it, if you squint a bit, although the actual performance of the army is obviously different.