mwahahahaha!You guys do realize that advice =\= agreeing with everything we suggest, right?
totally QFT
once again, wise words from the Pike...
mwahahahaha!You guys do realize that advice =\= agreeing with everything we suggest, right?
Be very careful, before you and include ME in "you guys". I would rather not being held responsible for posts made by people who are not me. I've tried to answer for a for questions, but I haven't been hostile toward any advice that has given so far. In fact I quite like some of the contributions.You guys do realize that advice =\= agreeing with everything we suggest, right?
Grrr... Yes, I complain bitterly NOW about the NOW overly-simplified CSM codex. But that is because the direction GW took with the current generation of books is back towards plethora of choices. Back when they released the CSM codex and in the following month the 5th ed. 40k rulebook, simplification seemed to be the montra of the game designers. I really enjoyed it then. I liked how the Eldar, DA, CSM, SM and IG books (and the BA online codex) were really easy to read and fit nicely with the newly designed rules. Then came the SWs and the following codexes and increasingly the CSM/DA/Eldar codexes look incredibly flimsy and choices look really scarce. Yes, I think the DA and CSM being the first two to revision is fitting.Whilst keeping things simple may be a good idea, the people who advocate that are also the folks who complain bitterly about the 4th ed Chaos Marine Codex being simplified from the hideous monstrosity of the convoluted 3.5th ed book. Just saying.
Sorry, that was my fault, I provoked him.Admiral-Badruck wrote:@job
What would possess you to make 40k comments on this thread. Please guys stay on target.![]()