Just to continue Pikey's trend of arguing over minor points for no real reason...
The Other Dave wrote:To weigh in with some supportive criticism in the service of making your excellent paint jobs even better
, I might say that the tracks and drive assembly and such are maybe a bit too metallic. Like, here's a tanque out in the world:
Basically no visible metallics at all, y'know?
Well, except for ALL of the tracks beneath the rubber pads added to each link. They aren't shiny, but they are steel.
Modern tanks and rebuilds going out on the road must have rubber treads. Steel track churns up the surface of the road, so by law road-going tracks must have rubber attachments. During WW2 every nation suffered from a major shortage of rubber. Synthetic types were used, but outside of the US, most nations minimized it's use on tracks or did away with it altogether. The US tanks and half-tracks went through a dozen different variations on the tread design because of issues with their supply chain and performance.
On roads, rubber treads were better, offering a smoother ride (less vibration through the hull damaging components) and they left the road in good condition for the vehicles following.
Off road, steel tracks had more grip in wet conditions and so the German tanks (with their poor supply chains) actually outperformed their lighter US opponents in the mud. Adding raised chevrons to the rubber blocks helped to improve performance.
Synthetic rubber abrades quite quickly, especially over rough terrain. Allegedly US tankers in Italy preferred bare steel over the rubber blocks as the rocky ground tore them to pieces.
So painting tracks in shiny, silvery metallic colours is wrong, but dull, grey steel should be the majority of the track surface on most vehicles on active service. Every other part of the tank should get a coat of paint.
D'oh, now I have to go and repaint all of my tank tracks.
...And according to one of the historians over on the Warlord forums who replied to Pikey, tracks are the only part of a WW2 tank which rusted. The paint prevented rusting and in breaks between fighting, crews would repaint the tank to keep them busy and out of mischief. The only vehicles which had time to rust were wrecks. Anything servicable was cleaned up and repainted constantly. Battles didn't really last long enough for tanks to get rusty.
The more you know eh?
Mike the Pike wrote:By the way, what's with you two guys agreeing on something and ganging up on poor old defenseless me?
Don't you have a laughing stock of a country to argue over?
A laughing stock? Hardly.
Just wait till Boris Johnson is PM, then you'll see what a laughing stock really is!