Malifaux = 3
Flames of War = Pages and pages. I don't have that many fingers and toes.
Phillip wrote:
December 12, 2010 at 11:59 pm
This poll represents the TGN network and is self selecting.
I would suggest that the nature of TGN means there will be an eclectic audience for your site that may be representative of non-GW gamers but not GW’s core market. As I understand it, GW’s nearest competitor has a turnover of less than 10% of GW’s 2009-2010 turnover …..
Why not try and poll gamers next time with demographics and perhaps asking the amount people spend?
Veritas wrote:
December 13, 2010 at 2:32 am
I agree. The results are always going to favor non-GW results as most people who want GW news will go to Warseer, BoLS, or the like. TTGN just doesn’t cater to that segment of the gaming public so they don’t come here. I’ve always felt TTGN is the gaming snob’s news site. (Not in a bad way!) You can’t get alot of the news here elsewhere, but a LOT of people like to poo-poo on GW.
Not really. It is a fact that more people clicked the button for liking FoW on their facebook page and that more people clicked the button for liking Malifaux on the TGN page. Did they poll everybody who has ever played any wargame ever? No, and nor are they likely too. As an indication of a games popularity they serve their purpose.Mike the Pike wrote:So to present any of these figures as any sort of 'fact' would be rather unbecoming then?![]()
Hmmm. So Malifaux is more popular than FoW (TGN) but no-one plays it? (TMP) They must be buying it for the fluff then.Mike the Pike wrote:But people on the site you chose to draw your stats from self-identify as non-fans of GW which is likely to skew the results somewhat.
As for the FOW vs Malifaux thing, you can't seriously believe that in either overall sales or global popularity Malifaux is even close to Flames of War. It's a great game but come on.
Anyways, according to this poll, no-one actually plays Malifaux![]()
http://theminiaturespage.com/polls/2092803135/